If I have 2 servers that will be utilizing hyper-v and storage spaces for clustering.
Instead of having a 3rd dedicated server to be a witness server for my DAG and have a single point of failure. I think I would be better clustering my file server 2012 utilizing hyper v between these two servers. Since if one server failed it would automatically move to the other and if both failed my exchange deployment would fail regardless.
Am I thinking correctly and would this provide better HA for my network? I would like to wipe the 3rd older and slower box and utilize it for some other applications.